European Union · Bill · CNS
1996/0190(CNS)
EC accession to the Madrid Protocol on the International Recognition of Marks (proposal for a decision)
Introduced
25 October 1996
Last action
—
Status
RDG1
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
14 November 2003
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
10 official languages
Danish
EF's tiltrædelse af protokollen til Madrid-arrangementet om den internationale registrering af varemærker (forsl. afg.)
German
Beitritt der EG zum Protokoll zum Madrider Abkommen über die intern. Registrierung von Marken (Vorschl.f.e. Entsch.)
Greek
Προσχώρηση της ΕΚ στο Πρωτόκολλο της Μαδρίτης που αφορά τη διεθνή καταχώριση σημάτων (Πρόταση απόφασης)
Spanish
Adhesión de la CE al Protocolo de Madrid relativo al Registro Internacional de Marcas (propuesta de decisión)
Finnish
EY:n liittyminen tavaramerkkien kansainvälistä rekisteröintiä koskevaan Madridin sopimukseen (päätösehd.)
French
Adhésion de la CE au Protocole de Madrid concernant l'enregistrement international des marques (Prop.décision)
Italian
Adesione CE al protocollo relativo all'intesa di Madrid sulla registrazione internazionale dei marchi (prop. dec.)
Dutch
Toetreding EG tot Protocol van Madrid betreffende de internationale inschrijving van merken (ontwerp-besluit)
Portuguese
Adesão da CE ao Protocolo de Madrid relativo ao Registo Internacional de Marcas (Proposta de decisão)
Swedish
EG:s anslutning till Madridprotokollet om internationell registrering av varumärken (förslag till beslut)
Records
Official bill 1996/0190(CNS) from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 25 October 1996. Status: RDG1.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.