PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN

E-10-2024-001643

Violation of the principle of media freedom and pluralism by Donald Tusk's government in Poland in relation to Telewizja Republika

answeredEuropean Union· European Parliament· PL

Introduced

6 September 2024

Last action

Status

answered

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

9 April 2025

Records

Official question E-10-2024-001643 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 6 September 2024. Status: answered.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

5 official files

Violation of the principle of media freedom and pluralism by the government of Donald Tusk in Poland in relation to Telewizja Republika

View fileDownload file

  • Violation of the principle of media freedom and pluralism by the government of Donald Tusk in Poland in relation to Telewizja Republika

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 12 September 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Violation of the principle of media freedom and pluralism by the government of Donald Tusk in Poland in relation to Telewizja Republika

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 12 September 2024

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Answer

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 9 April 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Łamanie zasady wolności i pluralizmu mediów przez rząd Donalda Tuska w Polsce w odniesieniu do Telewizji Republika

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · PL · 12 September 2024

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Łamanie zasady wolności i pluralizmu mediów przez rząd Donalda Tuska w Polsce w odniesieniu do Telewizji Republika

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · PL · 12 September 2024

    DownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.