Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN

E-10-2025-000597

Destrozo medioambiental en Zaragoza: privatización y tala masiva en el espacio natural «Los Pinares de Venecia» para ampliar un parque de atracciones

answeredEuropean Union· European Parliament· ES

Introduced

10 February 2025

Last action

—

Status

answered

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 April 2025

Records

Official question E-10-2025-000597 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 10 February 2025. Status: answered.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

5 official files

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

  • Answer

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 14 April 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Environmental destruction in Zaragoza: privatisation and mass logging in the Los Pinares de Venecia natural area to expand a theme park

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 18 February 2025

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Environmental destruction in Zaragoza: privatisation and mass logging in the Los Pinares de Venecia natural area to expand a theme park

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 18 February 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Destrozo medioambiental en Zaragoza: privatización y tala masiva en el espacio natural «Los Pinares de Venecia» para ampliar un parque de atracciones

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · ES · 18 February 2025

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Destrozo medioambiental en Zaragoza: privatización y tala masiva en el espacio natural «Los Pinares de Venecia» para ampliar un parque de atracciones

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · ES · 18 February 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.