European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN
E-10-2025-002562
Inconsistency of the classification of nuclear energy as transition energy in green taxonomy and the investment planned until 2050 in the PINC
Introduced
25 June 2025
Last action
—
Status
answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
3 November 2025
Records
Official question E-10-2025-002562 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 25 June 2025. Status: answered.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
5 official files
Contradiction of the classification of nuclear energy as transitional energy in the green taxonomy and planned investment in the nuclear illustrative programme up to 2050
Contradiction of the classification of nuclear energy as transitional energy in the green taxonomy and planned investment in the nuclear illustrative programme up to 2050
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 3 July 2025
Contradiction of the classification of nuclear energy as transitional energy in the green taxonomy and planned investment in the nuclear illustrative programme up to 2050
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 3 July 2025
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 3 November 2025
Incongruencia de la clasificación de la energía nuclear como energía de transición en taxonomía verde y la inversión prevista hasta 2050 en el PINC
QUESTION_WRITTEN · ES · 3 July 2025
Incongruencia de la clasificación de la energía nuclear como energía de transición en taxonomía verde y la inversión prevista hasta 2050 en el PINC
QUESTION_WRITTEN · ES · 3 July 2025
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.