PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN

E-10-2026-001711

The status of Imbros and Tenedos in the light of a combined examination of the Treaty of Lausanne and the Montreux Convention

answeredEuropean Union· European Parliament· EL

Introduced

27 April 2026

Last action

Status

answered

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 July 2026

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

1 official language
  • English

    The status of Imbros and Tenedos in the light of a combined examination of the Treaty of Lausanne and the Montreux Convention

Records

Official question E-10-2026-001711 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 27 April 2026. Status: answered.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

5 official files

  • The status of Imbros and Tenedos in the light of a combined examination of the Treaty of Lausanne and the Montreux Convention

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 11 May 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • The status of Imbros and Tenedos in the light of a combined examination of the Treaty of Lausanne and the Montreux Convention

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 11 May 2026

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Answer

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 1 July 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Το καθεστώς της Ίμβρου και της Τενέδου, υπό το φως της συνδυαστικής εξέτασης των Συνθηκών Λωζάννης και Μοντρέ

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EL · 11 May 2026

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Το καθεστώς της Ίμβρου και της Τενέδου, υπό το φως της συνδυαστικής εξέτασης των Συνθηκών Λωζάννης και Μοντρέ

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EL · 11 May 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.