PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN

E-10-2026-003332

ChatGPT advertisements across EU countries: transparency, profiling and consumer protection

openEuropean Union· European Parliament· EN

Introduced

25 August 2026

Last action

25 August 2026 · Written question

Status

QUESTION_WRITTEN

Sponsors

Sandro GOZI

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

25 August 2026

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

1 official language
  • Italian

    Pubblicità in ChatGPT nei paesi dell'UE: trasparenza, profilazione e tutela dei consumatori

Records

Official question E-10-2026-003332 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 25 August 2026. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN.

Timeline

  1. 25 August 2026

    Written question

    ChatGPT advertisements across EU countries: transparency, profiling and consumer protection

    Source: QUESTION_WRITTEN

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

4 official files

ChatGPT advertisements across EU countries: transparency, profiling and consumer protection

View fileDownload file

  • ChatGPT advertisements across EU countries: transparency, profiling and consumer protection

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 1 September 2026

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • ChatGPT advertisements across EU countries: transparency, profiling and consumer protection

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 1 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Pubblicità in ChatGPT nei paesi dell'UE: trasparenza, profilazione e tutela dei consumatori

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 1 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Pubblicità in ChatGPT nei paesi dell'UE: trasparenza, profilazione e tutela dei consumatori

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 1 September 2026

    DownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.