European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN
E-8-2014-005974
Pure LRIC cost modelling for mobile and fixed termination rates
Introduced
24 July 2014
Last action
—
Status
answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
21 August 2014
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
English
Pure LRIC cost modelling for mobile and fixed termination rates
Records
Official question E-8-2014-005974 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 24 July 2014. Status: answered.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
11 official files
Pure LRIC cost modelling for mobile and fixed termination rates
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
Pure LRIC cost modelling for mobile and fixed termination rates
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
Pure LRIC cost modelling for mobile and fixed termination rates
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
Pure LRIC cost modelling for mobile and fixed termination rates
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
Pure LRIC cost modelling for mobile and fixed termination rates
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
Pure LRIC - Kostenberechnungsmodell für mobile und fixe Zustellungsentgelte
QUESTION_WRITTEN · DE · 8 June 2018
Pure LRIC - Kostenberechnungsmodell für mobile und fixe Zustellungsentgelte
QUESTION_WRITTEN · DE · 8 June 2018
Pure LRIC - Kostenberechnungsmodell für mobile und fixe Zustellungsentgelte
QUESTION_WRITTEN · DE · 8 June 2018
Pure LRIC - Kostenberechnungsmodell für mobile und fixe Zustellungsentgelte
QUESTION_WRITTEN · DE · 8 June 2018
Pure LRIC - Kostenberechnungsmodell für mobile und fixe Zustellungsentgelte
QUESTION_WRITTEN · DE · 8 June 2018
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 21 August 2014
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.