European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN
E-8-2014-008222
Exempting cofinancing expenditure from Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) requirements
Introduced
22 October 2014
Last action
—
Status
answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
13 January 2015
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
English
Exempting cofinancing expenditure from Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) requirements
Records
Official question E-8-2014-008222 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 22 October 2014. Status: answered.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
11 official files
Exempting cofinancing expenditure from Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) requirements
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
Exempting cofinancing expenditure from Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) requirements
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
Exempting cofinancing expenditure from Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) requirements
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
Exempting cofinancing expenditure from Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) requirements
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
Exempting cofinancing expenditure from Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) requirements
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
Esclusione del cofinanziamento dei fondi dal PSC
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 8 June 2018
Esclusione del cofinanziamento dei fondi dal PSC
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 8 June 2018
Esclusione del cofinanziamento dei fondi dal PSC
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 8 June 2018
Esclusione del cofinanziamento dei fondi dal PSC
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 8 June 2018
Esclusione del cofinanziamento dei fondi dal PSC
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 8 June 2018
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 13 January 2015
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.