European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN
E-8-2014-009004
Hogyan indokolja a Bizottság az egyes tájképi elemek beszámításánál előírt hátrányos megkülönböztetést
Introduced
10 November 2014
Last action
23 December 2014 · Answer
Status
answered
Sponsors
Norbert ERDŐS
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
23 December 2014
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
English
How does the Commission justify its discriminatory rules on the inclusion of individual landscape features in ecological focus areas?
Records
Official question E-8-2014-009004 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 10 November 2014. Status: answered.
Timeline
10 November 2014
Written question
Hogyan indokolja a Bizottság az egyes tájképi elemek beszámításánál előírt hátrányos megkülönböztetést
Source: QUESTION_WRITTEN
23 December 2014
Answer
Source: QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
11 official files
Hogyan indokolja a Bizottság az egyes tájképi elemek beszámításánál előírt hátrányos megkülönböztetést
This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hogyan indokolja a Bizottság az egyes tájképi elemek beszámításánál előírt hátrányos megkülönböztetést
QUESTION_WRITTEN · HU · 8 June 2018
Hogyan indokolja a Bizottság az egyes tájképi elemek beszámításánál előírt hátrányos megkülönböztetést
QUESTION_WRITTEN · HU · 8 June 2018
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hogyan indokolja a Bizottság az egyes tájképi elemek beszámításánál előírt hátrányos megkülönböztetést
QUESTION_WRITTEN · HU · 8 June 2018
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hogyan indokolja a Bizottság az egyes tájképi elemek beszámításánál előírt hátrányos megkülönböztetést
QUESTION_WRITTEN · HU · 8 June 2018
DownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hogyan indokolja a Bizottság az egyes tájképi elemek beszámításánál előírt hátrányos megkülönböztetést
QUESTION_WRITTEN · HU · 8 June 2018
DownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
How does the Commission justify its discriminatory rules on the inclusion of individual landscape features in ecological focus areas?
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
DownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
How does the Commission justify its discriminatory rules on the inclusion of individual landscape features in ecological focus areas?
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
How does the Commission justify its discriminatory rules on the inclusion of individual landscape features in ecological focus areas?
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
DownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
How does the Commission justify its discriminatory rules on the inclusion of individual landscape features in ecological focus areas?
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
How does the Commission justify its discriminatory rules on the inclusion of individual landscape features in ecological focus areas?
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 June 2018
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 23 December 2014
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sponsors
- Norbert ERDŐS · AUTHOR
- · COM · ADDRESSEE
- · EU_COMMISSION · ADDRESSEE
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-8-2014-009004_EN.html
- Open data entity: https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/parliamentary-questions/E-8-2014-009004
- eu · E-8-2014-009004 · source updated 23 December 2014