European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN
E-8-2015-002528
VP/HR - Case of Ahmed Douma and other political prisoners in Egypt
Introduced
17 February 2015
Last action
—
Status
QUESTION_WRITTEN
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
17 February 2015
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
Dutch
VP/HR - De zaak van Ahmed Douma en andere politieke gevangenen in Egypte
Records
Official question E-8-2015-002528 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 17 February 2015. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
11 official files
VP/HR - Case of Ahmed Douma and other political prisoners in Egypt
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Case of Ahmed Douma and other political prisoners in Egypt
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Case of Ahmed Douma and other political prisoners in Egypt
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Case of Ahmed Douma and other political prisoners in Egypt
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Case of Ahmed Douma and other political prisoners in Egypt
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER
VP/HR - De zaak van Ahmed Douma en andere politieke gevangenen in Egypte
QUESTION_WRITTEN · NL · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - De zaak van Ahmed Douma en andere politieke gevangenen in Egypte
QUESTION_WRITTEN · NL · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - De zaak van Ahmed Douma en andere politieke gevangenen in Egypte
QUESTION_WRITTEN · NL · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - De zaak van Ahmed Douma en andere politieke gevangenen in Egypte
QUESTION_WRITTEN · NL · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - De zaak van Ahmed Douma en andere politieke gevangenen in Egypte
QUESTION_WRITTEN · NL · 7 June 2018
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.