PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN

E-8-2016-005381

EU Justice Scoreboard: the time taken for a first instance court to reach a decision cannot be a criterion to measure the efficiency of justice systems

Original: Pregled stanja na področju pravosodja v EU: čas, ki ga sodišče prve stopnje potrebuje za sprejetje sodne odločbe, ne more biti kriterij za merjenje učinkovitosti sodstva

Official English title

openEuropean Union· European Parliament· SL

Introduced

30 June 2016

Last action

30 June 2016 · Written question

Status

QUESTION_WRITTEN

Sponsors

Milan ZVER

Subjects

Artificial intelligence

Source updated

30 June 2016

Artificial intelligence

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

1 official language
  • English

    EU Justice Scoreboard: the time taken for a first instance court to reach a decision cannot be a criterion to measure the efficiency of justice systems

Record

Official question E-8-2016-005381 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 30 June 2016. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN.

Timeline

  1. 30 June 2016

    Written question

    EU Justice Scoreboard: the time taken for a first instance court to reach a decision cannot be a criterion to measure the efficiency of justice systems

    Source: QUESTION_WRITTEN

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

10 official files

  • EU Justice Scoreboard: the time taken for a first instance court to reach a decision cannot be a criterion to measure the efficiency of justice systems

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • EU Justice Scoreboard: the time taken for a first instance court to reach a decision cannot be a criterion to measure the efficiency of justice systems

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • EU Justice Scoreboard: the time taken for a first instance court to reach a decision cannot be a criterion to measure the efficiency of justice systems

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • EU Justice Scoreboard: the time taken for a first instance court to reach a decision cannot be a criterion to measure the efficiency of justice systems

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • EU Justice Scoreboard: the time taken for a first instance court to reach a decision cannot be a criterion to measure the efficiency of justice systems

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Pregled stanja na področju pravosodja v EU: čas, ki ga sodišče prve stopnje potrebuje za sprejetje sodne odločbe, ne more biti kriterij za merjenje učinkovitosti sodstva

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · SL · 7 June 2018

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Pregled stanja na področju pravosodja v EU: čas, ki ga sodišče prve stopnje potrebuje za sprejetje sodne odločbe, ne more biti kriterij za merjenje učinkovitosti sodstva

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · SL · 7 June 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Pregled stanja na področju pravosodja v EU: čas, ki ga sodišče prve stopnje potrebuje za sprejetje sodne odločbe, ne more biti kriterij za merjenje učinkovitosti sodstva

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · SL · 7 June 2018

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Pregled stanja na področju pravosodja v EU: čas, ki ga sodišče prve stopnje potrebuje za sprejetje sodne odločbe, ne more biti kriterij za merjenje učinkovitosti sodstva

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · SL · 7 June 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Pregled stanja na področju pravosodja v EU: čas, ki ga sodišče prve stopnje potrebuje za sprejetje sodne odločbe, ne more biti kriterij za merjenje učinkovitosti sodstva

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · SL · 7 June 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.