European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN
E-8-2016-005821
VP/HR - Ramadan ban and human rights violations in Xinjiang, China
Introduced
14 July 2016
Last action
—
Status
QUESTION_WRITTEN
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
14 July 2016
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
Bulgarian
VP/HR - Забраната на Рамадан и нарушения на правата на човека в Синцзян, Китай
Records
Official question E-8-2016-005821 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 14 July 2016. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
10 official files
VP/HR - Ramadan ban and human rights violations in Xinjiang, China
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Ramadan ban and human rights violations in Xinjiang, China
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Ramadan ban and human rights violations in Xinjiang, China
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Ramadan ban and human rights violations in Xinjiang, China
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Ramadan ban and human rights violations in Xinjiang, China
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Забраната на Рамадан и нарушения на правата на човека в Синцзян, Китай
QUESTION_WRITTEN · BG · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Забраната на Рамадан и нарушения на правата на човека в Синцзян, Китай
QUESTION_WRITTEN · BG · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Забраната на Рамадан и нарушения на правата на човека в Синцзян, Китай
QUESTION_WRITTEN · BG · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Забраната на Рамадан и нарушения на правата на човека в Синцзян, Китай
QUESTION_WRITTEN · BG · 7 June 2018
VP/HR - Забраната на Рамадан и нарушения на правата на човека в Синцзян, Китай
QUESTION_WRITTEN · BG · 7 June 2018
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.