PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN

E-8-2018-001695

Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on the agreements with Singapore and Japan

answeredEuropean Union· European Parliament· FR

Introduced

20 March 2018

Last action

Status

answered

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

17 May 2018

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

1 official language
  • English

    Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on the agreements with Singapore and Japan

Records

Official question E-8-2018-001695 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 20 March 2018. Status: answered.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

11 official files

  • Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on the agreements with Singapore and Japan

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 23 April 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on the agreements with Singapore and Japan

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 23 April 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on the agreements with Singapore and Japan

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 23 April 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on the agreements with Singapore and Japan

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 23 April 2018

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on the agreements with Singapore and Japan

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 23 April 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Answer

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 17 May 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · FR · 23 April 2018

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · FR · 23 April 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · FR · 23 April 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · FR · 23 April 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · FR · 23 April 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.