European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN
E-9-2019-002960
Possible discharge of contaminated water from Fukushima into the sea
Introduced
25 September 2019
Last action
—
Status
answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
20 December 2019
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
English
Possible discharge of contaminated water from Fukushima into the sea
Records
Official question E-9-2019-002960 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 25 September 2019. Status: answered.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
11 official files
Possible discharge of contaminated water from Fukushima into the sea
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 October 2019
Possible discharge of contaminated water from Fukushima into the sea
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 8 October 2019
Possible discharge of contaminated water from Fukushima into the sea
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 October 2019
Possible discharge of contaminated water from Fukushima into the sea
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 October 2019
Possible discharge of contaminated water from Fukushima into the sea
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 7 October 2019
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 20 December 2019
Possibile riversamento di acqua contaminata di Fukushima in mare
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 14 October 2019
Possibile riversamento di acqua contaminata di Fukushima in mare
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 14 October 2019
Possibile riversamento di acqua contaminata di Fukushima in mare
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 7 October 2019
Possibile riversamento di acqua contaminata di Fukushima in mare
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 7 October 2019
Possibile riversamento di acqua contaminata di Fukushima in mare
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 7 October 2019
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.