European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN
E-9-2020-005814
Veto by Poland’s United Right government of EU documents containing the words ‘gender equality’
Introduced
27 October 2020
Last action
—
Status
answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
27 January 2021
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
English
Veto by Poland’s United Right government of EU documents containing the words ‘gender equality’
Records
Official question E-9-2020-005814 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 27 October 2020. Status: answered.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
7 official files
Veto by Poland’s United Right government of EU documents containing the words ‘gender equality’
Veto by Poland’s United Right government of EU documents containing the words ‘gender equality’
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 16 November 2020
Veto by Poland’s United Right government of EU documents containing the words ‘gender equality’
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 16 November 2020
Veto by Poland’s United Right government of EU documents containing the words ‘gender equality’
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 16 November 2020
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 27 January 2021
Wetowanie przez rząd polskiej Zjednoczonej Prawicy dokumentów UE zawierających sformułowanie „gender equality” – „równość płci”
QUESTION_WRITTEN · PL · 16 November 2020
Wetowanie przez rząd polskiej Zjednoczonej Prawicy dokumentów UE zawierających sformułowanie „gender equality” – „równość płci”
QUESTION_WRITTEN · PL · 16 November 2020
Wetowanie przez rząd polskiej Zjednoczonej Prawicy dokumentów UE zawierających sformułowanie „gender equality” – „równość płci”
QUESTION_WRITTEN · PL · 16 November 2020
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.