European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN
E-9-2021-004001
Asiago, Bologna, Parmigiano and Prosecco: the EU Commission defends Italian geographical indications in the trade agreement with Chile
Introduced
31 August 2021
Last action
—
Status
answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
29 October 2021
Records
Official question E-9-2021-004001 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 31 August 2021. Status: answered.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
7 official files
Asiago, Bologna, Parmigiano and Prosecco: defence by the Commission of Italy’s geographic indications in the trade agreement with Chile
Asiago, Bologna, Parmigiano and Prosecco: defence by the Commission of Italy’s geographic indications in the trade agreement with Chile
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 15 September 2021
Asiago, Bologna, Parmigiano and Prosecco: defence by the Commission of Italy’s geographic indications in the trade agreement with Chile
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 15 September 2021
Asiago, Bologna, Parmigiano and Prosecco: defence by the Commission of Italy’s geographic indications in the trade agreement with Chile
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 15 September 2021
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 29 October 2021
Asiago, Bologna, Parmigiano e Prosecco: la Commissione UE difenda le indicazioni geografiche italiane nell'accordo commerciale con il Cile
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 15 September 2021
Asiago, Bologna, Parmigiano e Prosecco: la Commissione UE difenda le indicazioni geografiche italiane nell'accordo commerciale con il Cile
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 15 September 2021
Asiago, Bologna, Parmigiano e Prosecco: la Commissione UE difenda le indicazioni geografiche italiane nell'accordo commerciale con il Cile
QUESTION_WRITTEN · IT · 15 September 2021
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.