European Union · Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN
E-9-2023-002985
ECtHR ruling in the Kovačević v Bosnia and Herzegovina case
Introduced
10 October 2023
Last action
19 January 2024 · Answer
Status
answered
Sponsors
Tineke STRIK, Klemen GROŠELJ, Thijs REUTEN
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
19 January 2024
Records
Official question E-9-2023-002985 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 10 October 2023. Status: answered.
Timeline
10 October 2023
Written question
ECtHR ruling in the Kovačević v Bosnia and Herzegovina case
Source: QUESTION_WRITTEN
19 January 2024
Answer
Source: QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
7 official files
Answer
This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 19 January 2024
Sodba Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice v zadevi Kovačević/Bosna in Herzegovina
QUESTION_WRITTEN · SL · 28 November 2023
DownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sodba Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice v zadevi Kovačević/Bosna in Herzegovina
QUESTION_WRITTEN · SL · 28 November 2023
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
ECtHR ruling in the Kovačević v Bosnia and Herzegovina case
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 28 November 2023
DownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
ECtHR ruling in the Kovačević v Bosnia and Herzegovina case
QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 28 November 2023
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
EHRM uitspraak in de zaak Kovačević tegen Bosnië en Herzegovina
QUESTION_WRITTEN · NL · 28 November 2023
DownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
EHRM uitspraak in de zaak Kovačević tegen Bosnië en Herzegovina
QUESTION_WRITTEN · NL · 28 November 2023
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sponsors
- Tineke STRIK · AUTHOR
- Klemen GROŠELJ · AUTHOR
- Thijs REUTEN · AUTHOR
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2023-002985_EN.html
- Open data entity: https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/parliamentary-questions/E-9-2023-002985
- eu · E-9-2023-002985 · source updated 19 January 2024