European Union · Regulation · R
CELEX 31977R2125
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2125/77 of 27 September 1977 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on knives with cutting blades, serrated or not (including pruning knives), other than knives falling within heading No 82.06, falling within heading No 82.09, originating in Singapore to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3021/76 apply
Introduced
27 September 1977
Last action
—
Status
No longer in force
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
27 September 1977
Records
Official regulation CELEX 31977R2125 from European Union at EUR-Lex. Dated 27 September 1977. Status: No longer in force.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
7 official files
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2125/77 of 27 September 1977 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on knives with cutting blades, serrated or not (including pruning knives), other than knives falling within heading No 82.06, falling within heading No 82.09, originating in Singapore to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3021/76 apply
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2125/77 of 27 September 1977 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on knives with cutting blades, serrated or not (including pruning knives), other than knives falling within heading No 82.06, falling within heading No 82.09, originating in Singapore to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3021/76 apply
official_journal · EN · 27 September 1977
European Legislation Identifier
eli
Kommissionens Forordning (EØF) nr. 2125/77 af 27. september 1977 om genindførelse af opkrævning af toldafgifter for knive, der ikke henhører under nogen anden position i dette kapitel, med skærende eller savtakket æg (herunder beskærerknive), under position 82.09, som har oprindelse i Singapore og omfattes af de toldpræferencer, der er fastsat i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3021/76
official_journal · DA · 27 September 1977
Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2125/77 der Kommission vom 27. September 1977 zur Wiedereinführung des Zollsatzes für Messer (andere als die der Tarifnummer 82.06) mit schneidender oder gezahnter Klinge, einschließlich Klappmesser für den Gartenbau, der Tarifnummer 82.09, mit Ursprung in Singapur, dem die in der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3021/76 des Rates vorgesehenen Zollpräferenzen gewährt werden
official_journal · DE · 27 September 1977
Verordening (EEG) nr. 2125/77 van de Commissie van 27 september 1977 houdende wederinstelling van de heffing van de douanerechten van toepassing op messen (andere dan die bedoeld bij post 82.06), ook indien getand, zaksnoeimessen daaronder begrepen, van post 82.09, van oorsprong uit Singapore, ten behoeve waarvan bij Verordening (EEG) nr. 3021/76 van de Raad algemene tariefpreferenties werden geopend
official_journal · NL · 27 September 1977
Regolamento (CEE) n. 2125/77 della Commissione, del 27 settembre 1977, che ripristina la riscossione dei dazi doganali applicabili ai coltelli (diversi da quelli della voce 82.06) a lama trinciante o dentata, compresi i roncoli chiudibili, della voce doganale 82.09, originari di Singapore, beneficiario delle preferenze tariffarie previste dal regolamento (CEE) n. 3021/76 del Consiglio
official_journal · IT · 27 September 1977
Règlement (CEE) n° 2125/77 de la Commission, du 27 septembre 1977, portant rétablissement de la perception des droits de douane applicables aux couteaux (autres que ceux du numéro 82.06) à lame tranchante ou dentelée, y compris les serpettes fermantes, de la position tarifaire 82.09, originaires de Singapour, bénéficiaire des préférences tarifaires prévues par le règlement (CEE) n° 3021/76 du Conseil
official_journal · FR · 27 September 1977
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.