PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Report · DC

CELEX 51976DC0066

PAPUA - NEW GUINEA REQUEST FOR MEMBERSHIP OF THE LOME CONVENTION (communication from the Commission to the Council)

openEuropean Union· European Commission· EN

Introduced

25 February 1976

Last action

Status

open

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

25 February 1976

Records

Official report CELEX 51976DC0066 from European Union at European Commission. Dated 25 February 1976. Status: open.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

6 official files

  • PAPUA - NEW GUINEA REQUEST FOR MEMBERSHIP OF THE LOME CONVENTION (communication from the Commission to the Council)

    preparatory · EN · 25 February 1976

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • PAPUA - NY GUINEA ANMODNING OM TILTRAEDELSE AF LOME-KONVENTIONEN (Kommissionens meddelelse til Rådet)

    preparatory · DA · 25 February 1976

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • PAPUASIA - NUOVA GUINEA DOMANDA DI ACCESSIONE ALLA CONVENZIONE DI LOME (Comunicazione della Commissione al Consiglio)

    preparatory · IT · 25 February 1976

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • PAPOUASIE - NOUVELLE-GUINEE DEMANDE D'ACCESSION A LA CONVENTION DE LOME (communication de la Commission au Conseil)

    preparatory · FR · 25 February 1976

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • PAPUA - NEUGUINEA ANTRAG AUF BEITRITT ZUM ABKOMMEN VON LOME (Mitteilung der Kommission an den Rat)

    preparatory · DE · 25 February 1976

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • PAPOEA - NIEUW-GUINEA VERZOEK OM TOETREDING TOT DE OVEREENKOMST VAN LOME (mededeling van de Commissie aan de Raad)

    preparatory · NL · 25 February 1976

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.