PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Report · CC

CELEX 62003CC0336

Opinion of Advocate General Stix-Hackl delivered on 11 November 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd v Office of Fair Trading.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - United Kingdom.#Protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts - Directive 97/7/EC - Contracts for the provision of transport services - Meaning - Contracts for car hire.#Case C-336/03.

Original

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

11 November 2004

Last action

11 November 2004 · Decided

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Transport

Source updated

11 November 2004

Transport

Record

Official report CELEX 62003CC0336 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 11 November 2004. Status: decided.

Timeline

  1. 11 November 2004

    Decided

    Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

  • Opinion of Advocate General Stix-Hackl delivered on 11 November 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd v Office of Fair Trading.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - United Kingdom.#Protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts - Directive 97/7/EC - Contracts for the provision of transport services - Meaning - Contracts for car hire.#Case C-336/03.

    judgment · EN · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika Stix-Hackl iznesen11. studenog 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd protiv Office of Fair Trading.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Ujedinjena Kraljevina.#Direktiva 97/7/EZ.#Predmet C-336/03.

    judgment · HR · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Stix-Hackl presentadas el 11 de noviembre de 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd contra Office of Fair Trading.#Petición de decisión prejudicial: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Reino Unido.#Protección de los consumidores en materia de contratos a distancia - Directiva 97/7/CE - Contratos de suministro de servicios de transporte - Concepto - Contratos de alquiler de vehículos.#Asunto C-336/03.

    judgment · ES · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Konklużjonijiet ta' l-Avukat Ġenerali - Stix-Hackl - 11 ta' Novembru 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd vs Office of Fair Trading.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - ir-Renju Unit.#Protezzjoni tal-konsumaturi fil-qasam ta' kuntratti li jsiru mill-bogħod -Direttiva 97/7/KE - Kuntratti ta' provvista ta' servizzi ta' trasport - Kunċett - Kuntratti ta' kiri ta' karrozzi.#Kawża C-336/03.

    judgment · MT · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Заключение на генералния адвокат Stix-Hackl представено на11 ноември 2004 г.#easyCar (UK) Ltd срещу Office of Fair Trading.#Искане за преюдициално заключение: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Обединеното кралство.#Директива 97/7/ЕО.#Дело C-336/03.

    judgment · BG · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Concluziile avocatului general Stix-Hackl prezentate la data de 11 noiembrie 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd împotriva Office of Fair Trading.#Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Regatul Unit.#Directivă 97/7/CE.#Cauza C-336/03.

    judgment · RO · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Stanovisko generální advokátky - Stix-Hackl - 11 listopadu 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd proti Office of Fair Trading.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Spojené království.#Ochrana spotřebitelů v oblasti smluv uzavřených na dálku - Směrnice 97/7/ES - Smlouvy o poskytování přepravních služeb - Pojem - Smlouvy o nájmu automobilů.#Věc C-336/03.

    judgment · CS · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca - Stix-Hackl - 11. novembra 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd proti Office of Fair Trading.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Združeno kraljestvo.#Varstvo potrošnikov glede sklepanja pogodb pri prodaji na daljavo - Direktiva 97/7/ES - Pogodbe za preskrbo storitev prevoza - Pojem - Pogodbe o najemu vozil.#Zadeva C-336/03.

    judgment · SL · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Προτάσεις της γενικης εισαγγελέα Stix-Hackl της 11ης Νοεμβρίου 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd κατά Office of Fair Trading.#Αίτηση για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο.#Προστασία των καταναλωτών κατά τις εξ αποστάσεως συμβάσεις - Οδηγία 97/7/EΚ - Συμβάσεις παροχής υπηρεσιών μεταφοράς - Έννοια - Συμβάσεις μισθώσεως αυτοκινήτων.#Υπόθεση C-336/03.

    judgment · EL · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Förslag till avgörande av generaladvokat Stix-Hackl föredraget den 11 november 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd mot Office of Fair Trading.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Förenade kungariket.#Konsumentskydd vid distansavtal - Direktiv 97/7/EG - Avtal om tillhandahållande av tjänster som avser transport - Begrepp - Biluthyrningsavtal.#Mål C-336/03.

    judgment · SV · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Generalinės advokatės Stix-Hackl išvada, pateikta 2004 m. lapkričio 11 d.#easyCar (UK) Ltd prieš Office of Fair Trading.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Jungtinė Karalystė.#Vartotojų apsauga nuotolinių sutarčių srityje - Direktyva 97/7/EB - Transporto paslaugų teikimo sutartys - Sąvoka - Automobilių nuomos sutartys.#Byla C-336/03.

    judgment · LT · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Ģenerāladvokātes Stix-Hackl secinājumi, sniegti 2004. gada 11.novembrī.#easyCar (UK) Ltd pret Office of Fair Trading.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Apvienotā Karaliste.#Patērētāju aizsardzība saistībā ar distances līgumiem - Direktīva 97/7/EK - Transporta pakalpojumu sniegšanas līgumi - Jēdziens - Automašīnu nomas līgumi.#Lieta C-336/03.

    judgment · LV · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Conclusões da advogada-geral Stix-Hackl apresentadas em 11 de Novembro de 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd contra Office of Fair Trading.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Reino Unido.#Protecção dos consumidores em matéria de contratos à distância - Directiva 97/7/CE - Contratos de fornecimento de serviços de transporte - Conceito - Contratos de aluguer de veículos.#Processo C-336/03.

    judgment · PT · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat Stix-Hackl fremsat den 11. november 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd mod Office of Fair Trading.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Forenede Kongerige.#Forbrugerbeskyttelse i forbindelse med aftaler vedrørende fjernsalg - direktiv 97/7/EF - aftaler om levering af tjenesteydelser i form af transport - begreb - aftaler om biludlejning.#Sag C-336/03.

    judgment · DA · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Conclusie van advocaat-generaal Stix-Hackl van 11 november 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd tegen Office of Fair Trading.#Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Verenigd Koninkrijk.#Bescherming van consument bij op afstand gesloten overeenkomsten - Richtlijn 97/7/EG - Overeenkomsten betreffende verrichten van diensten voor vervoer - Begrip - Autoverhuurovereenkomsten.#Zaak C-336/03.

    judgment · NL · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Conclusions de l'avocat général Stix-Hackl présentées le 11 novembre 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd contre Office of Fair Trading.#Demande de décision préjudicielle: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Royaume-Uni.#Protection des consommateurs en matière de contrats à distance - Directive 97/7/CE - Contrats de fourniture de services de transports - Notion - Contrats de location de voitures.#Affaire C-336/03.

    judgment · FR · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Opinia rzecznika generalnego Stix-Hackl przedstawione w dniu 11 listopada 2004 r.#easyCar (UK) Ltd przeciwko Office of Fair Trading.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Zjednoczone Królestwo.#Ochrona konsumentów w przypadku umów zawieranych na odległość - Dyrektywa 97/7/WE - Umowy o świadczenie usług w zakresie transportu - Pojęcie - Umowy o wynajem samochodów.#Sprawa C-336/03.

    judgment · PL · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Conclusioni dell'avvocato generale Stix-Hackl del 11 novembre 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd contro Office of Fair Trading.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Regno Unito.#Protezione dei consumatori in materia di contratti a distanza - Direttiva 97/7/CE - Contratti di fornitura di servizi relativi ai trasporti - Nozione - Contratti di noleggio di autoveicoli.#Causa C-336/03.

    judgment · IT · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Julkisasiamiehen ratkaisuehdotus Stix-Hackl 11 päivänä marraskuuta 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd vastaan Office of Fair Trading.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta.#Kuluttajansuoja etäsopimuksissa - Direktiivi 97/7/EY - Kuljetuspalvelujen tarjoamista koskeva sopimus - Käsite - Autonvuokraussopimukset.#Asia C-336/03.

    judgment · FI · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Kohtujuristi ettepanek - Stix-Hackl - 11. november 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd versus Office of Fair Trading.#Eelotsusetaotlus: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Ühendkuningriik.#Tarbijate kaitse sidevahendi abil sõlmitud lepingute korral - Direktiiv 97/7/EÜ - Transporditeenuste osutamise lepingud - Mõiste - Autorendilepingud.#Kohtuasi C-336/03.

    judgment · ET · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Schlussanträge der Generalanwältin Stix-Hackl vom 11. November 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd gegen Office of Fair Trading.#Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Vereinigtes Königreich.#Verbraucherschutz bei Vertragsabschlüssen im Fernabsatz - Richtlinie 97/7/EG - Verträge über die Erbringung von Dienstleistungen im Bereich Beförderung - Begriff - Automietverträge.#Rechtssache C-336/03.

    judgment · DE · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Návrhy generálnej advokátky - Stix-Hackl - 11. novembra 2004.#easyCar (UK) Ltd proti Office of Fair Trading.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Spojené kráľovstvo.#Ochrana spotrebiteľa vzhľadom na zmluvy na diaľku - Smernica 97/7/ES - Zmluvy o poskytnutí služieb prepravy - Pojem - Zmluvy o nájme áut.#Vec C-336/03.

    judgment · SK · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Stix-Hackl főtanácsnok indítványa, az ismertetés napja: 2004. november 11.#easyCar (UK) Ltd kontra Office of Fair Trading.#Előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - Egyesült Királyság.#Fogyasztók védelme távollévők között kötött szerződések esetén - A 97/7/EK irányelv - Szállítási szolgáltatásokra vonatkozó szerződések - Fogalom - Gépkocsi bérleti szerződések.#C-336/03. sz. ügy.

    judgment · HU · 11 November 2004

    DownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.