PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Report · CC

CELEX 62012CC0120

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 16 May 2013. # Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 74(2) - Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - First and third subparagraphs of Rule 50(1) - Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark - Existence of the mark - Evidence submitted in support of the opposition after the expiry of the period set for that purpose - Failure to take account thereof - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Provision to the contrary - Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account. # Case C-120/12 P.

Original

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

16 May 2013

Last action

16 May 2013 · Decided

Status

decided

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

16 May 2013

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Record

Official report CELEX 62012CC0120 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 16 May 2013. Status: decided.

Timeline

  1. 16 May 2013

    Decided

    Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 16 May 2013. # Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 74(2) - Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - First and third subparagraphs of Rule 50(1) - Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark - Existence of the mark - Evidence submitted in support of the opposition after the expiry of the period set for that purpose - Failure to take account thereof - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Provision to the contrary - Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account. # Case C-120/12 P.

    judgment · EN · 16 May 2013

    DownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.