European Union · Report · CC
CELEX 62019CC0619
Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 16 July 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – ‘Stuttgart 21’ infrastructure project – Refusal of a request for environmental information – Article 4(1) – Grounds for refusal – Term ‘internal communications’ – Scope – Limitation in time of the protection of such communications.#Case C-619/19.
Introduced
16 July 2020
Last action
16 July 2020 · Decided
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Environment, Transport
Source updated
16 July 2020
Records
Official report CELEX 62019CC0619 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 16 July 2020. Status: decided.
Timeline
16 July 2020
Decided
Source: work_date_document
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
23 official files
Stanovisko generálního advokáta G. Hogana přednesené dne 16. července 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg v. D.R.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Životní prostředí – Aarhuská úmluva – Směrnice 2003/4/ES – Přístup veřejnosti k informacím o životním prostředí – Projekt výstavby infrastruktury ‚Stuttgart 21‘ – Zamítnutí žádosti o informace o životním prostředí – Článek 4 odst. 1 – Důvody pro zamítnutí – Pojem ‚vnitřní komunikace‘ – Rozsah – Časové omezení ochrany takové komunikace.#Věc C-619/19.
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Stanovisko generálního advokáta G. Hogana přednesené dne 16. července 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg v. D.R.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Životní prostředí – Aarhuská úmluva – Směrnice 2003/4/ES – Přístup veřejnosti k informacím o životním prostředí – Projekt výstavby infrastruktury ‚Stuttgart 21‘ – Zamítnutí žádosti o informace o životním prostředí – Článek 4 odst. 1 – Důvody pro zamítnutí – Pojem ‚vnitřní komunikace‘ – Rozsah – Časové omezení ochrany takové komunikace.#Věc C-619/19.
judgment · CS · 16 July 2020
Návrhy prednesené 16. júla 2020 – generálny advokát G. Hogan.#Land Baden-Württemberg proti D.R.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Životné prostredie – Aarhuský dohovor – Smernica 2003/4/ES – Prístup verejnosti k informáciám o životnom prostredí – Projekt výstavby infraštruktúry ‚Stuttgart 21‘ – Zamietnutie žiadosti o informácie o životnom prostredí – Článok 4 ods. 1 – Dôvody zamietnutia – Pojem ‚interná korešpondencia‘ – Rozsah – Časové obmedzenie ochrany takej korešpondencie.#Vec C-619/19.
judgment · SK · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Opinia rzecznika generalnego G. Hogana przedstawiona w dniu 16 lipca 2020 r.#Land Baden-Württemberg przeciwko D.R.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Środowisko naturalne – Konwencja z Aarhus – Dyrektywa 2003/4/WE – Publiczny dostęp do informacji dotyczących środowiska – Przedsięwzięcie budowy infrastruktury „Stuttgart 21” – Oddalenie wniosku o udzielenie informacji o środowisku – Artykuł 4 ust. 1 – Podstawy odmowy – Pojęcie „materiałów przeznaczonych do wewnętrznego komunikowania się” – Zakres – Ograniczenie w czasie ochrony takich materiałów.#Sprawa C-619/19.
judgment · PL · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Заключение на генералния адвокат G. Hogan, представено на 16 юли 2020 г.#Land Baden-Württemberg срещу D.R.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Преюдициално запитване — Околна среда — Орхуска конвенция — Директива 2003/4/ЕО — Обществен достъп до информация за околната среда — Проект за изграждане на инфраструктура „Щутгарт 21“ — Отказ на искане за предоставяне на информация за околната среда — Член 4, параграф 1 — Основания за отказ — Понятие „вътрешно съобщение“ — Обхват — Ограничение във времето на защитата на такива съобщения.#Дело C-619/19.
judgment · BG · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusie van advocaat-generaal G. Hogan van 16 juli 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg tegen D.R.#Verzoek van het Bundesverwaltungsgericht om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Milieu – Verdrag van Aarhus – Richtlijn 2003/4/EG – Toegang van het publiek tot milieu-informatie – Infrastructuurproject ‚Stuttgart 21’ – Afwijzing van een verzoek om milieu-informatie – Artikel 4, lid 1 – Gronden voor weigering – Begrip ‚interne mededelingen’ – Draagwijdte – Beperking in de tijd van de bescherming van dergelijke mededelingen.#Zaak C-619/19.
judgment · NL · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika Hogana od 16. srpnja 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg protiv D.R.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Okoliš – Aarhuška konvencija – Direktiva 2003/4/EZ – Javni pristup informacijama o okolišu – Projekt izgradnje infrastrukture ‚Stuttgart 21’ – Odbijanje zahtjeva za informacije o okolišu – Članak 4. stavak 1. – Razlozi za odbijanje – Pojam ,interna komunikacija’ – Doseg – Vremensko ograničenje zaštite takve komunikacije.#Predmet C-619/19.
judgment · HR · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. G. Hogan, presentadas el 16 de julio de 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg contra D. R.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Medio ambiente — Convenio de Aarhus — Directiva 2003/4/CE — Acceso del público a la información medioambiental — Proyecto de construcción de infraestructuras “Stuttgart 21” — Denegación de una solicitud de información medioambiental — Artículo 4, apartado 1 — Motivos de denegación — Concepto de “comunicaciones internas” — Alcance — Limitación en el tiempo de la protección de dichas comunicaciones.#Asunto C-619/19.
judgment · ES · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca G. Hogana, predstavljeni 16. julija 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg proti D. R.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Predhodno odločanje – Okolje – Aarhuška konvencija – Direktiva 2003/4/ES – Dostop javnosti do informacij o okolju – Načrt izgradnje infrastruktur ‚Stuttgart 21‘ – Zavrnitev zahteve za informacije o okolju – Člen 4(1) – Razlogi za zavrnitev – Pojem ‚notranje sporočanje‘ – Obseg – Časovna omejitev varstva takega sporočanja.#Zadeva C-619/19.
judgment · SL · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Julkisasiamies G. Hoganin ratkaisuehdotus 16.7.2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg vastaan D.R.#Bundesverwaltungsgerichtin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Ympäristö – Århusin yleissopimus – Direktiivi 2003/4/EY – Ympäristötiedon julkinen saatavuus – Infrastruktuurirakennushanke ”Stuttgart 21” – Ympäristötietopyynnön epääminen – 4 artiklan 1 kohta – Epäämisperusteet – Sisäisten asiakirjojen käsite – Ulottuvuus – Sisäisiä asiakirjoja koskevan suojan ajallinen rajoittaminen.#Asia C-619/19.
judgment · FI · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusions de l'avocat général M. G. Hogan, présentées le 16 juillet 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg contre D.R.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Convention d’Aarhus – Directive 2003/4/CE – Accès du public à l’information en matière d’environnement – Projet de construction d’infrastructures “Stuttgart 21” – Rejet d’une demande d’information environnementale – Article 4, paragraphe 1 – Motifs de refus – Notion de “communications internes” – Portée – Limitation dans le temps de la protection de telles communications.#Affaire C-619/19.
judgment · FR · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat G. Hogan fremsat den 16. juli 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg mod D.R.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – miljø – Århuskonventionen – direktiv 2003/4/EF – offentlig adgang til miljøoplysninger – infrastrukturbyggeprojektet »Stuttgart 21« – afslag på en anmodning om adgang til miljøoplysninger – artikel 4, stk. 1 – begrundelser for afslag – begrebet »interne meddelelser« – rækkevidde – tidsmæssig begrænsning af beskyttelsen af sådanne meddelelser.#Sag C-619/19.
judgment · DA · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts G. Hogan vom 16. Juli 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg gegen D.R.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Umwelt – Übereinkommen von Aarhus – Richtlinie 2003/4/EG – Zugang der Öffentlichkeit zu Umweltinformationen – Infrastrukturbauprojekt ‚Stuttgart 21‘ – Ablehnung eines Antrags auf Umweltinformationen – Art. 4 Abs. 1 – Ablehnungsgründe – Begriff ‚interne Mitteilungen‘ – Tragweite – Zeitliche Begrenzung des Schutzes interner Mitteilungen.#Rechtssache C-619/19.
judgment · DE · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusões do advogado-geral G. Hogan apresentadas em 16 de julho de 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg contra D.R.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reenvio prejudicial — Ambiente — Convenção de Aarhus — Diretiva 2003/4/CE — Acesso do público às informações sobre ambiente — Projeto de construção de infraestruturas “Stuttgart 21” — Indeferimento de um pedido de informação sobre ambiente — Artigo 4.o, n.o 1 — Motivos de indeferimento — Conceito de “comunicações internas” — Alcance — Limitação no tempo da proteção dessas comunicações.#Processo C-619/19.
judgment · PT · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Προτάσεις του γενικού εισαγγελέα G. Hogan της 16ης Ιουλίου 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg κατά D.R.#Αίτηση του Bundesverwaltungsgericht για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Περιβάλλον – Σύμβαση του Aarhus – Οδηγία 2003/4/ΕΚ – Πρόσβαση του κοινού σε περιβαλλοντικές πληροφορίες – Έργο κατασκευής υποδομών “Stuttgart 21” – Απόρριψη αίτησης περιβαλλοντικής πληροφορίας – Άρθρο 4, παράγραφος 1 – Λόγοι άρνησης – Έννοια των “εσωτερικών επικοινωνιών” – Περιεχόμενο – Χρονικός περιορισμός της προστασίας τέτοιων επικοινωνιών.#Υπόθεση C-619/19.
judgment · EL · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Ģenerāladvokāta Dž. Hogana [G. Hogan] secinājumi, 2020. gada 16. jūlijs.#Land Baden-Württemberg pret D.R.#Bundesverwaltungsgericht lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Vide – Orhūsas konvencija – Direktīva 2003/4/EK – Vides informācijas pieejamība sabiedrībai – Infrastruktūras būvniecības projekts Stuttgart 21 – Vides informācijas pieprasījuma noraidīšana – 4. panta 1. punkts – Atteikuma pamati – Jēdziens “iekšējā informācijas apmaiņa” – Piemērojamība – Šādas informācijas apmaiņas aizsardzības ierobežojums laikā.#Lieta C-619/19.
judgment · LV · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Förslag till avgörande av generaladvokat G. Hogan föredraget den 16 juli 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg mot D.R.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Miljö – Århuskonventionen – Direktiv 2003/4/EG – Allmänhetens tillgång till miljöinformation – Infrastrukturprojekt ’Stuttgart 21’ – Avslag på en begäran om miljöinformation – Artikel 4.1 – Skäl för avslag – Begreppet ’interna meddelanden’ – Räckvidd – Begränsning i tiden av skyddet för sådana meddelanden.#Mål C-619/19.
judgment · SV · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Generalinio advokato G. Hogan išvada, pateikta 2020 m. liepos 16 d.#Land Baden-Württemberg prieš D.R.#Bundesverwaltungsgericht prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Aplinka – Orhuso konvencija – Direktyva 2003/4/EB – Visuomenės galimybė susipažinti su informacija apie aplinką – Infrastruktūros kūrimo projektas „Stuttgart 21“ – Prašymo pateikti informaciją apie aplinką atmetimas – 4 straipsnio 1 dalis – Atsisakymo pagrindai – Sąvoka „vidaus pranešimai“ – Taikymo sritis – Vidaus pranešimų apsaugos apribojimas laiko atžvilgiu.#Byla C-619/19.
judgment · LT · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Kohtujurist Hogani ettepanek, 16.7.2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg versus D.R.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Keskkond – Århusi konventsioon – Direktiiv 2003/4/EÜ – Üldsuse õigus tutvuda keskkonnateabega – Taristuehitusprojekt „Stuttgart 21“ – Keskkonnateabe taotluse tagasilükkamine – Artikli 4 lõige 1 – Tagasilükkamise põhjused – Mõiste „asutusesisene teabevahetus“ – Ulatus – Niisuguse teabevahetuse kaitse ajaline piiramine.#Kohtuasi C-619/19.
judgment · ET · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Concluziile avocatului general G. Hogan prezentate la 16 iulie 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg împotriva lui D.R.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Trimitere preliminară – Mediu – Convenția de la Aarhus – Directiva 2003/4/CE – Accesul publicului la informațiile despre mediu – Proiectul de construire de infrastructuri „Stuttgart 21” – Respingere a unei cereri de informații despre mediu – Articolul 4 alineatul (1) – Motive de refuz – Noțiunea de „comunicări interne” – Domeniu de aplicare – Limitare în timp a protecției unor astfel de comunicări.#Cauza C-619/19.
judgment · RO · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
G. Hogan főtanácsnok indítványa, az ismertetés napja: 2020. július 16.#Land Baden-Württemberg kontra D.R.#A Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Németország) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Környezet – Aarhusi Egyezmény – 2003/4/EK irányelv – A környezeti információkhoz való nyilvános hozzáférés – A »Stuttgart 21« infrastruktúra építésére irányuló projekt – Környezeti információ iránti kérelem elutasítása – A 4. cikk (1) bekezdése – Kizáró okok – A »belső közlemény« fogalma – Terjedelem – Az ilyen közlemények védelmének időbeli korlátozása.#C-619/19. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusioni dell’avvocato generale G. Hogan, presentate il 16 luglio 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg contro D.R.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Ambiente – Convenzione di Aarhus – Direttiva 2003/4/CE – Accesso del pubblico all’informazione in materia ambientale – Progetto di costruzione di infrastrutture “Stuttgart 21” – Rigetto di una domanda di informazione ambientale – Articolo 4, paragrafo 1 – Motivi di rifiuto – Nozione di “comunicazioni interne” – Portata – Limitazione nel tempo della tutela di siffatte comunicazioni.#Causa C-619/19.
judgment · IT · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Konklużjonijiet tal-Avukat Ġenerali G. Hogan, ippreżentati fis-16 ta’ Lulju 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg vs D.R.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mill-Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Ambjent – Konvenzjoni ta’Aarhus – Direttiva 2003/4/KE – Aċċess pubbliku għal informazzjoni ambjentali – Proġett ta’ bini ta’ infrastrutturi ‘Stuttgart 21’ – Ċaħda ta’ talba għal informazzjoni ambjentali – Artikolu 4(1) – Raġunijiet għal rifjut – Kunċett ta’ ‘komunikazzjonijiet interni’ – Portata – Limitazzjoni ratione temporis tal-protezzjoni ta’ tali komunikazzjonijiet.#Kawża C-619/19.
judgment · MT · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 16 July 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – ‘Stuttgart 21’ infrastructure project – Refusal of a request for environmental information – Article 4(1) – Grounds for refusal – Term ‘internal communications’ – Scope – Limitation in time of the protection of such communications.#Case C-619/19.
judgment · EN · 16 July 2020
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- · CJ · Court of Justice of the European Union
- · 795b6018-a77a-4a5a-ae91-d77329bd386f · 795b6018-a77a-4a5a-ae91-d77329bd386f
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62019CC0619
- Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4458f603-c760-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1
- eurlex · 62019CC0619 · source updated 16 July 2020