Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 9 December 2021.#Q and Others v United Airlines, Inc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Connecting flight consisting of two flight legs – Significant delay to final destination caused in the second leg of that flight linking two airports in a third country – Validity of that regulation under international law.#Case C-561/20.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

9 December 2021

Last action

9 December 2021 · Decided

Status

decided

Records

Official report CELEX 62020CC0561 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 9 December 2021. Status: decided.

Timeline

9 December 2021
Decided
Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

Förslag till avgörande av generaladvokat M. A. Rantos föredraget den 9 december 2021.#Q m.fl. mot United Airlines, Inc.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Lufttransport – Förordning (EG) nr 261/2004 – Gemensamma regler om kompensation och assistans till passagerare vid nekad ombordstigning och inställda eller kraftigt försenade flygningar – Flygning med direkt anslutande flygförbindelser bestående av två flygetapper – Kraftigt försenad ankomst till den slutliga bestämmelseorten beroende på en försening som uppkom under den andra etappen av denna flygning, mellan två flygplatser i ett tredjeland – Denna förordnings giltighet i förhållande till internationell rätt.#Mål C-561/20.

View file Download file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

Translate to

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Förslag till avgörande av generaladvokat M. A. Rantos föredraget den 9 december 2021.#Q m.fl. mot United Airlines, Inc.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Lufttransport – Förordning (EG) nr 261/2004 – Gemensamma regler om kompensation och assistans till passagerare vid nekad ombordstigning och inställda eller kraftigt försenade flygningar – Flygning med direkt anslutande flygförbindelser bestående av två flygetapper – Kraftigt försenad ankomst till den slutliga bestämmelseorten beroende på en försening som uppkom under den andra etappen av denna flygning, mellan två flygplatser i ett tredjeland – Denna förordnings giltighet i förhållande till internationell rätt.#Mål C-561/20.
judgment · SV · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Concluziile avocatului general A. Rantos prezentate la 9 decembrie 2021.#Q și alții împotriva United Airlines Inc.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Trimitere preliminară – Transport aerian – Regulamentul (CE) nr. 261/2004 – Norme comune în materie de compensare și de asistență a pasagerilor în eventualitatea refuzului la îmbarcare și a anulării sau a întârzierii prelungite a zborurilor – Zbor cu legătură directă care cuprinde două segmente de zbor – Întârziere prelungită la destinația finală care își are originea în al doilea segment al acestui zbor, care leagă două aeroporturi dintr‑o țară terță – Validitatea acestui regulament în raport cu dreptul internațional.#Cauza C-561/20.
judgment · RO · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusie van advocaat-generaal A. Rantos van 9 december 2021.#Q e.a. tegen United Airlines, Inc.#Verzoek van de Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Luchtvervoer – Verordening (EG) nr. 261/2004 – Gemeenschappelijke regels inzake compensatie en bijstand aan passagiers bij instapweigering en annulering of langdurige vertraging van vluchten – Twee rechtstreeks aansluitende vluchten – Aankomst op de eindbestemming met langdurige vertraging die is ontstaan tijdens de tweede vlucht, die heeft plaatsgevonden tussen twee luchthavens in een derde land – Geldigheid van deze verordening in het licht van het internationaal recht.#Zaak C-561/20.
judgment · NL · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Generalinio advokato A. Rantos išvada, pateikta 2021 m. gruodžio 9 d.#Q ir kt. prieš United Airlines, Inc.#Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Oro transportas – Reglamentas (EB) Nr. 261/2004 – Bendros kompensavimo ir pagalbos keleiviams taisyklės atsisakymo vežti ir skrydžių atšaukimo arba atidėjimo ilgam laikui atveju – Jungiamasis skrydis, kurį sudaro du segmentai – Didelis vėlavimas atvykti į galutinę paskirties vietą, atsiradęs antrame šio skrydžio segmente, jungiančiame du trečiosios šalies oro uostus – Šio reglamento galiojimas, atsižvelgiant į tarptautinę teisę.#Byla C-561/20.
judgment · LT · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Προτάσεις του γενικού εισαγγελέα Α. Ράντου της 9ης Δεκεμβρίου 2021.#Q κ.λπ. κατά United Airlines Inc.#Αίτηση του Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Αεροπορικές μεταφορές – Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) 261/2004 – Kοινοί κανόνες αποζημίωσης των επιβατών αεροπορικών μεταφορών και παροχής βοήθειας σε αυτούς σε περίπτωση άρνησης επιβίβασης και ματαίωσης ή μεγάλης καθυστέρησης της πτήσης – Πτήση με ανταπόκριση που περιλαμβάνει δύο σκέλη – Μεγάλη καθυστέρηση άφιξης στον τελικό προορισμό που επήλθε κατά το δεύτερο σκέλος της πτήσης το οποίο εκτελέστηκε μεταξύ δύο αερολιμένων τρίτης χώρας – Κύρος του κανονισμού υπό το πρίσμα του διεθνούς δικαίου.#Υπόθεση C-561/20.
judgment · EL · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts A. Rantos vom 9. Dezember 2021.#Q u. a. gegen United Airlines Inc.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen der Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Luftverkehr – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 261/2004 – Gemeinsame Regelung für Ausgleichs- und Unterstützungsleistungen für Fluggäste im Fall der Nichtbeförderung und bei Annullierung oder großer Verspätung von Flügen – Zwei Teilflüge umfassender Flug mit Umsteigen – Große Verspätung am Endziel, die ihre Ursache im zweiten Teilflug dieses Fluges zwischen zwei Flughäfen eines Drittstaats hat – Gültigkeit dieser Verordnung im Hinblick auf das Völkerrecht.#Rechtssache C-561/20.
judgment · DE · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Заключение на генералния адвокат A. Rantos, представено на 9 декември 2021 г.#Q и др. срещу United Airlines, Inc.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Преюдициално запитване — Въздушен транспорт — Регламент (ЕО) № 261/2004 — Общи правила за обезщетяване и помощ на пътниците при отказан достъп на борда и отмяна или голямо закъснение на полети — Директно свързващ полет, който се състои от две части — Голямо закъснение в крайния пункт на пристигане, възникнало при втората част от този полет, която свързва две летища на трета страна — Валидност на този регламент от гледна точка на международното право.#Дело C-561/20.
judgment · BG · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusões do advogado-geral A. Rantos apresentadas em 9 de dezembro de 2021.#Q e o. contra United Airlines Inc.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Reenvio prejudicial — Transporte aéreo — Regulamento n.° 261/2004 — Regras comuns em matéria de indemnização e de assistência dos passageiros em caso de recusa de embarque e de anulação ou de atraso de um voo — Voo sucessivo composto por dois segmentos de voo — Atraso considerável no destino final que tem origem no segundo segmento deste voo que liga dois aeroportos de um país terceiro — Validade deste regulamento à luz do direito internacional.#Processo C-561/20.
judgment · PT · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
A. Rantos főtanácsnok indítványa, az ismertetés napja: 2021. december 9.#Q és társai kontra United Airlines, Inc.#A Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel (Belgium) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Légi közlekedés – 261/2004/EK rendelet – A visszautasított beszállás és légi járatok törlése vagy jelentős késése esetén az utasoknak nyújtandó kártalanítás és segítség közös szabályai – Két járatszakaszból álló csatlakozó járat – E légi járatnak valamely harmadik ország két repülőterét összekötő második szakasza során a végső célállomáson bekövetkezett jelentős késés – E rendeletnek a nemzetközi jogra tekintettel való érvényessége.#C-561/20. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika A. Rantosa od 9. prosinca 2021.#Q i dr. protiv United Airlines Inc.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Zračni prijevoz – Uredba (EZ) br. 261/2004 – Opća pravila odštete i pomoći putnicima u slučaju uskraćenog ukrcaja i otkazivanja ili dužeg kašnjenja leta – Izravno povezan let koji se sastoji od dvaju dijelova leta – Duže kašnjenje na konačno odredište do kojeg je došlo zbog drugog dijela tog leta između dviju zračnih luka treće zemlje – Valjanost te uredbe s obzirom na međunarodno pravo.#Predmet C-561/20.
judgment · HR · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Stanovisko generálního advokáta A. Rantose přednesené dne 9. prosince 2021.#Q a další v. United Airlines, Inc.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Letecká doprava – Nařízení (ES) č. 261/2004 – Společná pravidla pro náhradu a pomoc cestujícím v letecké dopravě v případě odepření nástupu na palubu, zrušení nebo významného zpoždění letu – Navazující let zahrnující dva úseky letu – Významné zpoždění v cílovém místě určení, k němuž došlo v druhém úseku tohoto letu mezi dvěma letišti umístěnými ve třetí zemi – Platnost tohoto nařízení z hlediska mezinárodního práva.#Věc C-561/20.
judgment · CS · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusions de l'avocat général M. A. Rantos, présentées le 9 décembre 2021.#Q e.a. contre United Airlines Inc.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transport aérien – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Règles communes en matière d’indemnisation et d’assistance des passagers en cas de refus d’embarquement et d’annulation ou de retard important d’un vol – Vol avec correspondance comprenant deux segments de vol – Retard important à la destination finale trouvant son origine dans le second segment de ce vol reliant deux aéroports d’un pays tiers – Validité de ce règlement au regard du droit international.#Affaire C-561/20.
judgment · FR · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat A. Rantos fremsat den 9. december 2021.#Q m.fl. mod United Airlines, Inc.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – lufttransport – forordning (EF) nr. 261/2004 – fælles bestemmelser om kompensation og bistand til luftfartspassagerer ved boardingafvisning og ved aflysning eller lange forsinkelser – flyvning med tilsluttet flyforbindelse, som består af to delflyvninger – lang forsinkelse på det endelige bestemmelsessted som følge af den del af flyvningen, der finder sted mellem to lufthavne i et tredjeland – forordningens lovlighed under hensyn til folkeretten.#Sag C-561/20.
judgment · DA · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Julkisasiamies A. Rantosin ratkaisuehdotus 9.12.2021.#Q ym. vastaan United Airlines Inc.#Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brusselin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Lentoliikenne – Asetus (EY) N:o 261/2004 – Matkustajille heidän lennolle pääsynsä epäämisen sekä lentojen peruuttamisen tai pitkäaikaisen viivästymisen johdosta annettavaa korvausta ja apua koskevat yhteiset säännöt – Kahdesta suoraan toisiinsa liittyvästä osuudesta koostuva lento – Lopulliseen määräpaikkaan saapumisen pitkäaikainen viivästyminen, joka johtuu kyseisen lennon jälkimmäisestä kolmannen maan kahden lentoaseman välillä lennetystä osuudesta – Kyseisen asetuksen pätevyys kansainvälisen oikeuden kannalta.#Asia C-561/20.
judgment · FI · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Kohtujurist Rantose ettepanek, 9.12.2021.#Q jt versus United Airlines Inc.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Lennutransport – Määrus (EÜ) nr 261/2004 – Ühiseeskirjad reisijatele lennureisist mahajätmise korral ning lendude tühistamise või pikaajalise hilinemise eest antava hüvitise ja abi kohta – Kahest lennusegmendist koosnev ümberistumisega lend – Pikaajaline hilinemine lõppsihtkohta selle lennu teisel lennul, mis ühendab kolmandas riigis asuvat kahte lennujaama – Selle määruse kehtivus rahvusvahelise õiguse seisukohast.#Kohtuasi C-561/20.
judgment · ET · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca A. Rantosa, predstavljeni 9. decembra 2021.#Q in drugi proti United Airlines, Inc.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Predhodno odločanje – Zračni promet – Uredba (ES) št. 261/2004 – Skupna pravila glede odškodnine in pomoči potnikom v primerih zavrnitve vkrcanja, odpovedi ali velike zamude letov – Let s prestopanjem, ki je sestavljen iz dveh delov – Velika zamuda na končnem namembnem kraju, nastala med drugim delom leta, opravljenim med dvema letališčema v tretji državi – Veljavnost te uredbe glede na mednarodno pravo.#Zadeva C-561/20.
judgment · SL · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Opinia rzecznika generalnego A. Rantosa przedstawiona w dniu 9 grudnia 2021 r.#Q i in. przeciwko United Airlines Inc.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Transport lotniczy – Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 261/2004 – Wspólne zasady odszkodowania i pomocy dla pasażerów w przypadku odmowy przyjęcia na pokład albo odwołania lub dużego opóźnienia lotów – Lot łączony obejmujący dwa etapy – Duże opóźnienie w miejscu docelowym powstałe na drugim etapie tego lotu między dwoma lotniskami położonymi na terenie państwa trzeciego – Ważność owego rozporządzenia w świetle prawa międzynarodowego.#Sprawa C-561/20.
judgment · PL · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. A. Rantos, presentadas el 9 de diciembre de 2021.#Q y otros contra United Airlines Inc.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Transporte aéreo — Reglamento (CE) n.º 261/2004 — Normas comunes sobre compensación y asistencia a los pasajeros aéreos en caso de denegación de embarque y de cancelación o gran retraso de los vuelos — Vuelo con conexión directa que se compone de dos tramos de vuelo — Gran retraso en la llegada al destino final que se ha originado en el segundo tramo de ese vuelo que cubría la ruta entre dos aeropuertos de un tercer país — Validez de dicho Reglamento a la luz del Derecho internacional.#Asunto C-561/20.
judgment · ES · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusioni dell’avvocato generale A. Rantos, presentate il 9 dicembre 2021.#Q e a. contro United Airlines, Inc.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Trasporto aereo – Regolamento (CE) n. 261/2004 – Regole comuni in materia di compensazione ed assistenza ai passeggeri in caso di negato imbarco, di cancellazione del volo o di ritardo prolungato – Volo in coincidenza composto da due segmenti di volo – Ritardo prolungato alla destinazione finale riconducibile al secondo segmento di tale volo che collega due aeroporti di un paese terzo – Validità di detto regolamento alla luce del diritto internazionale.#Causa C-561/20.
judgment · IT · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Návrhy prednesené 9. decembra 2021 – generálny advokát A. Rantos.#Q a i. proti United Airlines Inc.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Letecká doprava – Nariadenie (ES) č. 261/2004 – Spoločné pravidlá systému náhrad a pomoci cestujúcim pri odmietnutí nástupu do lietadla, v prípade zrušenia alebo veľkého meškania letov – Let s priamym prípojom pozostávajúci z dvoch úsekov letu – Veľké meškanie v konečnom cieľovom mieste spôsobené na druhom úseku tohto letu medzi dvoma letiskami tretej krajiny – Platnosť tohto nariadenia z hľadiska medzinárodného práva.#Vec C-561/20.
judgment · SK · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Konklużjonijiet tal-Avukat Ġenerali A. Rantos, ippreżentati fid-9 ta’ Diċembru 2021.#Q et vs United Airlines, Inc.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa min-Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Trasport bl-ajru – Regolament (KE) Nru 261/2004 – Regoli komuni fil-qasam tal-kumpens u tal-assistenza lill-passiġġieri fil-każ ta’ rifjut ta’ imbark u ta’ kanċellazzjoni jew dewmien twil ta’ titjira – Titjira b’konnessjoni, li jinkludi żewġ segmenti tat-titjira – Dewmien twil fid-destinazzjoni finali li joriġina mit-tieni segment ta’ din it-titjira li tgħaqqad żewġ ajruporti ta’ pajjiż terz – Validità ta’ dan ir-regolament fid-dawl tad-dritt internazzjonali.#Kawża C-561/20.
judgment · MT · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Ģenerāladvokāta A. Ranta [A. Rantos] secinājumi, 2021. gada 9. decembris.#Q u.c. pret United Airlines Inc.#Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Gaisa pārvadājumi – Regula (EK) Nr. 261/2004 – Kopīgi noteikumi par kompensāciju un atbalstu pasažieriem sakarā ar iekāpšanas atteikumu un lidojumu atcelšanu vai ilgu kavēšanos – Savienots reiss, ko veido divi lidojuma segmenti – Ilga ielidošanas kavēšanās galamērķī, kas radusies šī lidojuma otrajā segmentā, kurš savieno divas lidostas trešā valstī – Šīs regulas spēkā esamība no starptautisko tiesību viedokļa.#Lieta C-561/20.
judgment · LV · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 9 December 2021.#Q and Others v United Airlines, Inc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Connecting flight consisting of two flight legs – Significant delay to final destination caused in the second leg of that flight linking two airports in a third country – Validity of that regulation under international law.#Case C-561/20.
judgment · EN · 9 December 2021
View Download Open at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Vertaal naar
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.

Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62020CC0561
Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cd8a34f7-58e3-11ec-91ac-01aa75ed71a1
eurlex · 62020CC0561 · source updated 9 December 2021