European Union · Resolution · RSP
2010/2663(RSP)
Religious freedom in Pakistan
Introduced
20 May 2010
Last action
—
Status
PLENARY_VOTE
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
20 May 2010
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
21 official languages
Bulgarian
Свобода на религията в Пакистан
Czech
Svoboda vyznání v Pákistánu
Danish
Religionsfrihed i Pakistan
German
Religionsfreiheit in Pakistan
Greek
Θρησκευτική ελευθερία στο Πακιστάν
Spanish
Libertad religiosa en Pakistán
Estonian
Usuvabadus Pakistanis
Finnish
Uskonnonvapaus Pakistanissa
French
Liberté de religion au Pakistan
Hungarian
Vallásszabadság Pakisztánban
Italian
Libertà religiosa in Pakistan
Lithuanian
Religijos laisvė Pakistane
Latvian
Reliģijas brīvība Pakistānā
Maltese
Il-libertà reliġjuża fil-Pakistan
Dutch
Godsdienstvrijheid in Pakistan
Polish
Wolność religijna w Pakistanie
Portuguese
Liberdade de religião no Paquistão
Romanian
Libertatea religioasă în Pakistan
Slovak
Sloboda náboženstva v Pakistane
Slovenian
Verska svoboda v Pakistanu
Swedish
Religionsfrihet i Pakistan *
Records
Official resolution 2010/2663(RSP) from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 20 May 2010. Status: PLENARY_VOTE.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
4 official files
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Religious freedom in Pakistan
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Religious freedom in Pakistan
RESOLUTION_MOTION · EN · 6 January 2020
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Religious freedom in Pakistan
RESOLUTION_MOTION · EN · 6 January 2020
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Religious freedom in Pakistan
RESOLUTION_MOTION · EN · 6 March 2014
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Religious freedom in Pakistan
RESOLUTION_MOTION · EN · 17 May 2010
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.