PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Resolution · RSP

2011/2515(RSP)

Rule of law in Russia

votedEuropean Union· European Parliament· EN

Introduced

17 February 2011

Last action

17 February 2011 · Introduced

Status

PLENARY_VOTE

Sponsors

Subjects

Rule of law

Source updated

17 February 2011

Rule of law

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

21 official languages
  • Bulgarian

    Зачитане на принципа на правовата държава в Русия

  • Czech

    Právní stát v Rusku

  • Danish

    Retsstatsprincipper i Rusland

  • German

    Rechtsstaatlichkeit in Russland

  • Greek

    Το κράτος δικαίου στη Ρωσία

  • Spanish

    Estado de Derecho en Rusia

  • Estonian

    Õigusriigi põhimõtted Venemaal

  • Finnish

    Oikeusvaltioperiaate Venäjällä

  • French

    État de droit en Russie

  • Hungarian

    A jogállamiság Oroszországban

  • Italian

    Stato di diritto in Russia

  • Lithuanian

    Teisinės valstybės principai Rusijoje

  • Latvian

    Tiesiskums Krievijā

  • Maltese

    L-istat tad-dritt fir-Russja

  • Dutch

    Rechtsstaat in Rusland

  • Polish

    Praworządność w Rosji

  • Portuguese

    Estado de Direito na Rússia

  • Romanian

    Statul de drept în Rusia

  • Slovak

    Právny štát v Rusku

  • Slovenian

    Pravna država v Rusiji

  • Swedish

    Rättsstatsprincipen i Ryssland

Records

Official resolution 2011/2515(RSP) from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 17 February 2011. Status: PLENARY_VOTE.

Timeline

  1. 17 February 2011

    Vote results

    Source: PLENARY_VOTE_RESULTS

  2. 17 February 2011

    Introduced

    Rule of law in Russia

    Source: RSP

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

90 official files

Documents page 1 of 2Next

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.