PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Resolution · RSP

2015/2530(RSP)

Anti-terrorism measures

votedEuropean Union· European Parliament· EN

Introduced

11 February 2015

Last action

—

Status

PLENARY_VOTE

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

11 February 2015

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

22 official languages

  • Bulgarian

    Мерки за борба с тероризма

  • Czech

    Protiteroristická opatření

  • Danish

    Foranstaltninger til bekæmpelse af terrorisme

  • German

    Maßnahmen zur Terrorismusbekämpfung

  • Greek

    Μέτρα κατά της τρομοκρατίας

  • Spanish

    Medidas de lucha contra el terrorismo

  • Estonian

    Terrorismivastased meetmed

  • Finnish

    Terrorismintorjuntatoimet

  • French

    Mesures de lutte contre le terrorisme

  • Croatian

    Antiterorističke mjere

  • Hungarian

    Terrorizmusellenes intézkedések

  • Italian

    Misure antiterrorismo

  • Lithuanian

    Kovos su terorizmu priemonės

  • Latvian

    Terorisma apkarošanas pasākumi

  • Maltese

    Miżuri kontra t-terroriżmu

  • Dutch

    Terrorismebestrijdingsmaatregelen

  • Polish

    Środki walki z terroryzmem

  • Portuguese

    Medidas de combate ao terrorismo

  • Romanian

    Măsuri antiterorism

  • Slovak

    Protiteroristické opatrenia

  • Slovenian

    Protiteroristični ukrepi

  • Swedish

    Åtgärder mot terrorism

Records

Official resolution 2015/2530(RSP) from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 11 February 2015. Status: PLENARY_VOTE.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

829 official files

Documents page 1 of 17Next

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.