Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Bill · Public

2016/116

Anti-Evictions Bill 2016

defeatedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

15 December 2016

Last action

19 January 2017 · Bill Defeated

Status

Defeated

Sponsors

Ruth Coppinger, Mick Barry, Richard Boyd Barrett, Paul Murphy, Bríd Smith, Gino Kenny

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

12 April 2018

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

1 official language
  • Irish

    An Bille i gcoinne Díshealbhuithe, 2016

Summary

Bill entitled an Act to amend the Residential Tenancies Act 2004 to provide for greater security of tenure by making all tenancies over two months Part 4 tenancies, by making Part 4 tenancies of indefinite duration, removing sale of property as a ground for terminating a tenancy, providing for compensation where a tenancy is terminated on the ground that the dwelling is required by the landlord or a relative of the landlord for their own occupation, extension of notice periods for new rents and for the termination of tenancies, and inclusion of receivers and lenders that have taken possession of properties in the definition of a landlord

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 15 December 2016

    Published

  2. 15 December 2016

    First Stage

    Source: Dáil Éireann

  3. 15 December 2016

    Second Stage

    Defeated

    Source: Dáil Éireann

  4. 19 January 2017

    Bill Defeated

    Source: Dáil Éireann

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.