1 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Taoiseach if, having regard to his reply to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 4, 5 and 6 of 13 March 1990, he has since then come to any conclusion as to whether the constitutional provision, which states that a Member of either House going to or returning from the House may not be arrested, ought to be referred to the Committee on Procedure and Privileges for further discussion as to the possibility of defining the constitutional provision more precisely in legislation.

Summary

1 Mr. J. Bruton asked the Taoiseach if, having regard to his reply to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 4, 5 and 6 of 13 March 1990, he has since then come to any conclusion as to whether the constitutional provision, which states that a Member of either House going to or returning from the House may not be arrested, ought to be referred to the Committee on Procedure and Privileges for further discussion as to the possibility of defining the constitutional provision more precisely in legislation.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Constitutional Provision Review.

  xml · EN · 19 December 1990

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.