PQ 10
9 Mr. Connor asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the reason 85.5 per cent of Ireland's bilateral assistance, amounting to £3.8 million, to countries affected adversely by the Gulf War was donated to Egypt and only 6.58 per cent was donated to Sudan given the fact that Egypt as a net oil supporter would have benefited from higher oil prices and also benefited from debt write-off while Sudan has no such advantages, is debt distressed and is suffering disastrous famine.
Introduced
21 May 1991
Last action
—
Status
oral
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
21 May 1991
Summary
9 Mr. Connor asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the reason 85.5 per cent of Ireland's bilateral assistance, amounting to £3.8 million, to countries affected adversely by the Gulf War was donated to Egypt and only 6.58 per cent was donated to Sudan given the fact that Egypt as a net oil supporter would have benefited from higher oil prices and also benefited from debt write-off while Sudan has no such advantages, is debt distressed and is suffering disastrous famine.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Bilateral Assistance.
Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Bilateral Assistance.
xml · EN · 21 May 1991
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/1991-05-21/10/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/1991-05-21/pq_10