PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 100

95 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to previous parliamentary questions in the case of persons (details supplied) in County Dublin, if he has satisfied himself that ORAC and RAT fully examined all of the evidence put forward by the applicants; his views on the strength and compelling nature of the submissions; if the information was dismissed as unbelievable; if so, the grounds on which it was dismissed; if, in view of the circumstances a case exists for a re-examination of the file with a view to granting extension of residency; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38449/06]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

16 November 2006

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

16 November 2006

Summary

95 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to previous parliamentary questions in the case of persons (details supplied) in County Dublin, if he has satisfied himself that ORAC and RAT fully examined all of the evidence put forward by the applicants; his views on the strength and compelling nature of the submissions; if the information was dismissed as unbelievable; if so, the grounds on which it was dismissed; if, in view of the circumstances a case exists for a re-examination of the file with a view to granting extension of residency; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38449/06]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Asylum Applications.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.