100. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 333 of 18 September 2018, if his attention was drawn to the fact that the person was on maternity leave; if his attention has been further drawn to the fact that they are trying to return to work, which they cannot do unless their stamp 4 is updated; if this principle is generally applicable in cases in which due to a pregnancy a woman had to leave the workforce as provided for under national and international law; if the decision in this case is a breach of equality legislation; if previous holders of stamp 4 residential status did not have such rights; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39201/18]

Summary

100. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 333 of 18 September 2018, if his attention was drawn to the fact that the person was on maternity leave; if his attention has been further drawn to the fact that they are trying to return to work, which they cannot do unless their stamp 4 is updated; if this principle is generally applicable in cases in which due to a pregnancy a woman had to leave the workforce as provided for under national and international law; if the decision in this case is a breach of equality legislation; if previous holders of stamp 4 residential status did not have such rights; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39201/18]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Immigration Status

  xml · EN · 27 September 2018

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.