PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 101

131 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the total amount of public money spent to date on the storage of electronic voting equipment; if he is satisfied that appropriate guidelines are in place governing the allocation of contracts for the storage of such equipment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11079/05]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

13 April 2005

Last action

13 April 2005 · Elections Management System.

Status

written

Sponsors

Ruairí Quinn

Subjects

Environment

Source updated

13 April 2005

Environment

Summary

131 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the total amount of public money spent to date on the storage of electronic voting equipment; if he is satisfied that appropriate guidelines are in place governing the allocation of contracts for the storage of such equipment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11079/05]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 13 April 2005

    Elections Management System.

    131 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the total amount of public money spent to date on the storage of electronic voting equipment; if he is satisfied that appropriate guidelines are in place governing the allocation of contracts for the storage of such equipment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11079/05]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Elections Management System.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Ruairí Quinn · Asking member
  • Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government · Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.