102. Deputy Paul Nicholas Gogarty asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage further to Parliamentary Question No. 270 of 18 September 2025, where he specifically states that “There are no plans at this time to expand the number of such terrestrial sites," and by implication there are “no plans at this time to” consider Rathcoole Alluvial Woodland as a potential candidate site for designation as an SAC, to clarify that he and his Department and agencies realise that the lack of designation means Rathcoole Alluvial Woodland has no protection from the impacts of prospective development of lands surrounding it or from other activities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [59453/25]

Summary

102. Deputy Paul Nicholas Gogarty asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage further to Parliamentary Question No. 270 of 18 September 2025, where he specifically states that “There are no plans at this time to expand the number of such terrestrial sites," and by implication there are “no plans at this time to” consider Rathcoole Alluvial Woodland as a potential candidate site for designation as an SAC, to clarify that he and his Department and agencies realise that the lack of designation means Rathcoole Alluvial Woodland has no protection from the impacts of prospective development of lands surrounding it or from other activities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [59453/25]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Special Areas of Conservation

  xml · EN · 25 November 2025

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.