Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 1027

1027. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 intends to deal with the one-judgment rule if the President of Ireland should invoke his Article 26 power to refer a Bill from the Oireachtas to the Supreme Court; the views of the Constitution Review Group on this matter; if he will detail the concerns of the group for not amending the one-judgment rule in this particular scenario, as opposed to the change the amendment will make to Article 34; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37137/13]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

18 September 2013

Last action

18 September 2013 · Constitutional Amendments

Status

written

Sponsors

Andrew Doyle

Subjects

Rule of law

Source updated

18 September 2013

Rule of law

Summary

1027. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 intends to deal with the one-judgment rule if the President of Ireland should invoke his Article 26 power to refer a Bill from the Oireachtas to the Supreme Court; the views of the Constitution Review Group on this matter; if he will detail the concerns of the group for not amending the one-judgment rule in this particular scenario, as opposed to the change the amendment will make to Article 34; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37137/13]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 September 2013

    Constitutional Amendments

    1027. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 intends to deal with the one-judgment rule if the President of Ireland should invoke his Article 26 power to refer a Bill from the Oireachtas to the Supreme Court; the views of the Constitution Review Group on this matter; if he will detail the concerns of the group for not amending the one-judgment rule in this particular scenario, as opposed to the change the amendment will make to Article 34; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37137/13]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Constitutional Amendments

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • Andrew Doyle · Asking member
  • Justice · Justice · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.