104. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 80 of 14 January, if he can justify the spending of the minor works flood mitigation scheme funds in view of the fact that the last minor works to construct a flood embankment was a failure and lead to the relocation of a family; if he is of the view that a minor works flood mitigation scheme application is an appropriate scheme to deal with rising groundwater rather than fluvial flooding; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3431/21]

Summary

104. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 80 of 14 January, if he can justify the spending of the minor works flood mitigation scheme funds in view of the fact that the last minor works to construct a flood embankment was a failure and lead to the relocation of a family; if he is of the view that a minor works flood mitigation scheme application is an appropriate scheme to deal with rising groundwater rather than fluvial flooding; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3431/21]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Flood Prevention Measures

  xml · EN · 21 January 2021

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.