Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 106

191 Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance his views on the proposal in the draft code on corporate governance in financial institutions to omit the whistle blowing provision requiring audit committees to review arrangements by which staff of a company may, in confidence, raise concerns about possible improprieties in matters of financial reports or other matters, which is a provision in the Financial Reporting Council Combined code on corporate governance; his views on whether this omission will weaken the code; if he believes this provision should be included in the code; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25672/10]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

15 June 2010

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

15 June 2010

Summary

191 Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance his views on the proposal in the draft code on corporate governance in financial institutions to omit the whistle blowing provision requiring audit committees to review arrangements by which staff of a company may, in confidence, raise concerns about possible improprieties in matters of financial reports or other matters, which is a provision in the Financial Reporting Council Combined code on corporate governance; his views on whether this omission will weaken the code; if he believes this provision should be included in the code; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25672/10]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Corporate Governance

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.