PQ 108
108 Mr. Haughey asked the Minister for Finance the threshold for liability for capital acquisitions tax in the case of a child inheriting a €750,000 family home on the death of a father in view of the fact that this child moved back into the family home for three years prior to the death, to care for the deceased even though the child owns a separate apartment elsewhere; if these special circumstances can be taken into account in determining liability; if this threshold can be raised for Dublin properties in view of the higher prices in this region; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42147/06]
Introduced
7 December 2006
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
7 December 2006
Summary
108 Mr. Haughey asked the Minister for Finance the threshold for liability for capital acquisitions tax in the case of a child inheriting a €750,000 family home on the death of a father in view of the fact that this child moved back into the family home for three years prior to the death, to care for the deceased even though the child owns a separate apartment elsewhere; if these special circumstances can be taken into account in determining liability; if this threshold can be raised for Dublin properties in view of the higher prices in this region; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42147/06]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Tax Code.
Tax Code.
xml · EN · 7 December 2006
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2006-12-07/108/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2006-12-07/pq_108