109. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 164 of 5 October 2016 to outline his views on the value of creating a potent disincentive to corrupt practices and whether the recovery of lost revenues where same are exposed and the patterns of success demonstrated in the jurisdiction he cited are strong arguments favouring a more expansive system of protected disclosure; and his further views on whether soft inspections of financial data from the corporate sector here leads to moral hazard. [30138/16]

Summary

109. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 164 of 5 October 2016 to outline his views on the value of creating a potent disincentive to corrupt practices and whether the recovery of lost revenues where same are exposed and the patterns of success demonstrated in the jurisdiction he cited are strong arguments favouring a more expansive system of protected disclosure; and his further views on whether soft inspections of financial data from the corporate sector here leads to moral hazard. [30138/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Protected Disclosures

  xml · EN · 13 October 2016

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.