PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 111

111. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Business, Enterprise and Innovation if her attention has been drawn to the fact that a company (details supplied) has refused to implement Labour Court recommendation LCR 21574 recommending enhanced redundancy terms in respect of employees working for a subsidiary being made redundant; if her attention has been further drawn to the fact that the company refused to allow the workers to be represented by a union of their choice and that in rejecting the appeal against the workers being made redundant the company described the Labour Court recommendation as inappropriate and out of line with company policy and stated that the workers’ involvement in the union was a contributory factor to the negative outcome of the appeal; and if she will consider contacting the company to express their views on its treatment of workers and apparent contempt for the State’s industrial relations machinery. [49531/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

22 November 2017

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

22 November 2017

Summary

111. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Business, Enterprise and Innovation if her attention has been drawn to the fact that a company (details supplied) has refused to implement Labour Court recommendation LCR 21574 recommending enhanced redundancy terms in respect of employees working for a subsidiary being made redundant; if her attention has been further drawn to the fact that the company refused to allow the workers to be represented by a union of their choice and that in rejecting the appeal against the workers being made redundant the company described the Labour Court recommendation as inappropriate and out of line with company policy and stated that the workers’ involvement in the union was a contributory factor to the negative outcome of the appeal; and if she will consider contacting the company to express their views on its treatment of workers and apparent contempt for the State’s industrial relations machinery. [49531/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Industrial Relations

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.