PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 1141

1141. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine further to Parliamentary Question No. 297 of 2 March 2017 and based on 2016 figures, the amount of revenue that would be forgone in each category in the livestock sector if the fee amount for each species was reduced by percentages (details supplied), in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19149/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

2 May 2017

Last action

2 May 2017 · Veterinary Inspection Service

Status

written

Sponsors

McConalogue, Charlie.

Subjects

Agriculture

Source updated

2 May 2017

Agriculture

Summary

1141. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine further to Parliamentary Question No. 297 of 2 March 2017 and based on 2016 figures, the amount of revenue that would be forgone in each category in the livestock sector if the fee amount for each species was reduced by percentages (details supplied), in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19149/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 May 2017

    Veterinary Inspection Service

    1141. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine further to Parliamentary Question No. 297 of 2 March 2017 and based on 2016 figures, the amount of revenue that would be forgone in each category in the livestock sector if the fee amount for each species was reduced by percentages (details supplied), in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19149/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Veterinary Inspection Service

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.