PQ 117
110 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Transport if he has received any further reports in relation to the re-opening of Killucan railway station; if steps have been taken to include same in the new ten-year transport plan; if his Department will assist both the local community group which is seeking to have same re-opened and Westmeath County Council, which has signalled the importance of the re-opening of this station, by including same in the county development plan; if this objective will be progressed without further unnecessary delay; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26104/05]
Introduced
29 September 2005
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
29 September 2005
Summary
110 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Transport if he has received any further reports in relation to the re-opening of Killucan railway station; if steps have been taken to include same in the new ten-year transport plan; if his Department will assist both the local community group which is seeking to have same re-opened and Westmeath County Council, which has signalled the importance of the re-opening of this station, by including same in the county development plan; if this objective will be progressed without further unnecessary delay; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26104/05]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Rail Network.
Rail Network.
xml · EN · 29 September 2005
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2005-09-29/117/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2005-09-29/pq_117