Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 119

176 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Finance the saving in 2009 of the 4% reduction in public service pay off 2008 outturn; the sectors that have been excluded from this requirement; the cost in 2009 of the carryover from pay settlements made earlier; the cost in 2009 of the new increase due in August 2009; the carryover cost of extra staff employed in 2008 on the 2009 pay bill; the additional employee numbers expected to be taken in 2009 and the extra pay bill involved; and if he will reconcile these elements with the final figures for the increase in gross public service pay and in gross public service pensions. [43921/08]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

2 December 2008

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 December 2008

Summary

176 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Finance the saving in 2009 of the 4% reduction in public service pay off 2008 outturn; the sectors that have been excluded from this requirement; the cost in 2009 of the carryover from pay settlements made earlier; the cost in 2009 of the new increase due in August 2009; the carryover cost of extra staff employed in 2008 on the 2009 pay bill; the additional employee numbers expected to be taken in 2009 and the extra pay bill involved; and if he will reconcile these elements with the final figures for the increase in gross public service pay and in gross public service pensions. [43921/08]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Public Service Remuneration.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.