1224. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on whether the animal identification and movement, AIM, system should not penalise farmers, should not be open to third parties and should not be restricted by his Department; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that other EU countries prohibit third parties from accessing all prior movement data; and his further views on AIM data being used by factories and retailers to penalise farmers based on the number of movements of their livestock. [36684/17]

Summary

1224. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on whether the animal identification and movement, AIM, system should not penalise farmers, should not be open to third parties and should not be restricted by his Department; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that other EU countries prohibit third parties from accessing all prior movement data; and his further views on AIM data being used by factories and retailers to penalise farmers based on the number of movements of their livestock. [36684/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Animal Identification Schemes

  xml · EN · 26 July 2017

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.