124. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No.111 of 25 October 2012 regarding the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 15 wherein refusal of back to education allowance was on the basis of the applicants course not being of a higher grade than they had studied previously which did not take account of the fact that the student did not complete the course due to family illness, if in the circumstances their eligibility may be reconsidered; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52070/12]

Summary

124. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No.111 of 25 October 2012 regarding the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 15 wherein refusal of back to education allowance was on the basis of the applicants course not being of a higher grade than they had studied previously which did not take account of the fact that the student did not complete the course due to family illness, if in the circumstances their eligibility may be reconsidered; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [52070/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Back to Education Allowance Eligibility

  xml · EN · 22 November 2012

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.