PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 130

130. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality her views on the functionality of the in camera rule within family law cases; her further views on the persons this rule primarily protects; her views on whether it offers protection to family members who are not guardians of the concerned child; her further views on whether a review of the rule is needed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [41461/16]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

17 January 2017

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

17 January 2017

Summary

130. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality her views on the functionality of the in camera rule within family law cases; her further views on the persons this rule primarily protects; her views on whether it offers protection to family members who are not guardians of the concerned child; her further views on whether a review of the rule is needed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [41461/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Family Law Cases

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.