PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 137

137. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person (details supplied) was issued with a letter from the State pension contributory social welfare office on 12 March explaining that a self-employed pension was dependent on payment of PRSI contributions, as outlined in section 110(1) of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005, yet a month later a follow-on letter was received stating that the relevant section was section 23.4 of the Act and as this provision had not been met, the payment would not be made. [20630/13]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

1 May 2013

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 May 2013

Summary

137. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person (details supplied) was issued with a letter from the State pension contributory social welfare office on 12 March explaining that a self-employed pension was dependent on payment of PRSI contributions, as outlined in section 110(1) of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005, yet a month later a follow-on letter was received stating that the relevant section was section 23.4 of the Act and as this provision had not been met, the payment would not be made. [20630/13]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

State Pension (Contributory) Appeals

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.