PQ 137
137. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person (details supplied) was issued with a letter from the State pension contributory social welfare office on 12 March explaining that a self-employed pension was dependent on payment of PRSI contributions, as outlined in section 110(1) of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005, yet a month later a follow-on letter was received stating that the relevant section was section 23.4 of the Act and as this provision had not been met, the payment would not be made. [20630/13]
Introduced
1 May 2013
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
1 May 2013
Summary
137. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person (details supplied) was issued with a letter from the State pension contributory social welfare office on 12 March explaining that a self-employed pension was dependent on payment of PRSI contributions, as outlined in section 110(1) of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005, yet a month later a follow-on letter was received stating that the relevant section was section 23.4 of the Act and as this provision had not been met, the payment would not be made. [20630/13]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
State Pension (Contributory) Appeals
State Pension (Contributory) Appeals
xml · EN · 1 May 2013
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2013-05-01/137/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2013-05-01/pq_137