Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 137

137. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the reason given by the Revenue Commissioners such a treatment has no legal provision and that such a treatment in the past was a concession and therefore had no legal basis with regard to the zero rated VAT treatment of food supplements that; if it provided guidance that indicated that food supplements constituted food within the terms of the second schedule to the Value-Added Tax Act 1972 (as amended); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37714/19]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

17 September 2019

Last action

—

Status

written

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

17 September 2019

Summary

137. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the reason given by the Revenue Commissioners such a treatment has no legal provision and that such a treatment in the past was a concession and therefore had no legal basis with regard to the zero rated VAT treatment of food supplements that; if it provided guidance that indicated that food supplements constituted food within the terms of the second schedule to the Value-Added Tax Act 1972 (as amended); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37714/19]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

VAT Rate Application

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.