Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 139

136 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason the details of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 20 have not been removed from the birth certificate of a person (details supplied) in the General Register Office despite that office having admitted in a letter to the parent that a fraud had been committed in including his name as father; and when such steps will be taken. [32961/04]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

9 December 2004

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

9 December 2004

Summary

136 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason the details of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 20 have not been removed from the birth certificate of a person (details supplied) in the General Register Office despite that office having admitted in a letter to the parent that a fraud had been committed in including his name as father; and when such steps will be taken. [32961/04]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

General Register Office.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.