12 Mr. O'Malley asked the Taoiseach if, in view of the Taoiseach's recent statement that Articles 2 and 3 had not been an issue at the time of the Sunningdale Agreement, nor at the 1985 Hillsborough Agreement, he accepts that, in the light of the subsequent McGimpsey Supreme Court judgment which ordained that the so-called territorial claim enshrined in Articles 2 and 3 is a constitutional imperative, this is bound to alter political perspectives of these Articles, and that they do not accord with the principle of unity by consent only, enshrined in Clause 1 of the Anglo-Irish Agreement; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Summary

12 Mr. O'Malley asked the Taoiseach if, in view of the Taoiseach's recent statement that Articles 2 and 3 had not been an issue at the time of the Sunningdale Agreement, nor at the 1985 Hillsborough Agreement, he accepts that, in the light of the subsequent McGimpsey Supreme Court judgment which ordained that the so-called territorial claim enshrined in Articles 2 and 3 is a constitutional imperative, this is bound to alter political perspectives of these Articles, and that they do not accord with the principle of unity by consent only, enshrined in Clause 1 of the Anglo-Irish Agreement; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Anglo-Irish Relations.

  xml · EN · 27 April 1993

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.