Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 14

12 Mr. O'Malley asked the Taoiseach if, in view of the Taoiseach's recent statement that Articles 2 and 3 had not been an issue at the time of the Sunningdale Agreement, nor at the 1985 Hillsborough Agreement, he accepts that, in the light of the subsequent McGimpsey Supreme Court judgment which ordained that the so-called territorial claim enshrined in Articles 2 and 3 is a constitutional imperative, this is bound to alter political perspectives of these Articles, and that they do not accord with the principle of unity by consent only, enshrined in Clause 1 of the Anglo-Irish Agreement; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

27 April 1993

Last action

27 April 1993 · Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Anglo-Irish Relations.

Status

oral

Sponsors

Desmond J. O'Malley

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

27 April 1993

Summary

12 Mr. O'Malley asked the Taoiseach if, in view of the Taoiseach's recent statement that Articles 2 and 3 had not been an issue at the time of the Sunningdale Agreement, nor at the 1985 Hillsborough Agreement, he accepts that, in the light of the subsequent McGimpsey Supreme Court judgment which ordained that the so-called territorial claim enshrined in Articles 2 and 3 is a constitutional imperative, this is bound to alter political perspectives of these Articles, and that they do not accord with the principle of unity by consent only, enshrined in Clause 1 of the Anglo-Irish Agreement; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 27 April 1993

    Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Anglo-Irish Relations.

    12 Mr. O'Malley asked the Taoiseach if, in view of the Taoiseach's recent statement that Articles 2 and 3 had not been an issue at the time of the Sunningdale Agreement, nor at the 1985 Hillsborough Agreement, he accepts that, in the light of the subsequent McGimpsey Supreme Court judgment which ordained that the so-called territorial claim enshrined in Articles 2 and 3 is a constitutional imperative, this is bound to alter political perspectives of these Articles, and that they do not accord with the principle of unity by consent only, enshrined in Clause 1 of the Anglo-Irish Agreement; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Anglo-Irish Relations.

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.