PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 145

138 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the protection his Department has under social welfare regulations, legislation or guidelines to ensure that social welfare recipients in receipt of recent family increases in Budget 2008 do not have the percentage rise clawed back by a local authority increasing its rent by a similar amount as to the budget rise; if, in determining social welfare payments in general the percentage of social welfare payments is determined by him as possible rent or accommodation payments; and if fuel or living alone allowances are included; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5919/08]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

14 February 2008

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 February 2008

Summary

138 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the protection his Department has under social welfare regulations, legislation or guidelines to ensure that social welfare recipients in receipt of recent family increases in Budget 2008 do not have the percentage rise clawed back by a local authority increasing its rent by a similar amount as to the budget rise; if, in determining social welfare payments in general the percentage of social welfare payments is determined by him as possible rent or accommodation payments; and if fuel or living alone allowances are included; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5919/08]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Social Welfare Code.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.